RE: Creation/evolution3
January 28, 2015 at 4:01 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2015 at 4:05 pm by Drich.)
(January 28, 2015 at 3:30 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: So what I am hearing is that two million people spend forty years in a geographically limited area and nothing is what we would expect to find for that.After 4000 years and no perminate structures, absolutly not. Why? Because of the cities of the time only the stone foundations remain!!!
Quote:Lets say for arguments sake that this very unlikely scenario is possible.It shows those who point to a lack of evidence as 'proof it did not happen' that their's is an argumentum ad ignorantiam. And place the exodus in the very same vain as Alexander the great's march where he lost an army in that region with out a trace, or the discourse that follows a excavation of a lost city that tells who those people were what they did from day to day and even proclaim a name of a city without any direct cocnclusive evidence. Yet somehow gets recorded in the books as that place.
How does that help with proving it happened?
At best it would be saying the exodus is unproven because its unsubstantiated by the evidence.
Again fending off those who are more than willing to argue from a position of ignorance, makes the exodus account plausible.
(January 28, 2015 at 3:33 pm)dyresand Wrote: Here this link provided just disproves all of the bible for all its worth http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/24...al-History
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/free-...scoveries/
check mate dry sand!
(January 28, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Coming out of your mouth, Drich.
zing! good one St. imbo