(August 10, 2010 at 5:55 pm)Edward the Theist Wrote:(August 10, 2010 at 1:35 pm)TheDarkestOfAngels Wrote: If you honestly believe it to be evidence, then I have to ask if is a paper that has been scientifically peer-reviewed by people who study conciousness, the brain, and any other area of study where that 'evidence' would be highly influential if it had any chance of being an accurate view of conciousness.
It's not that complicated. It doesn't need scientists to peer review it. The general public can review it and decide.
Swing and a miss my friend. If it explains what you claim it's going to require a hell of a lot of math and physics knowledge to prove, not to mention testing. That's going to get scientific peer review, and if we can't test or prove it then it's useless, I will admit though I am quite curious to read it.
My religion is the understanding of my world. My god is the energy that underlies it all. My worship is my constant endeavor to unravel the mysteries of my religion. 
