RE: Would you let your employer or office building put an RFID chip in you?
February 3, 2015 at 6:31 pm
(This post was last modified: February 3, 2015 at 6:32 pm by Jackalope.)
(February 3, 2015 at 6:23 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(February 3, 2015 at 5:56 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: The embeddable RFID chips don't (and can't) transmit unless they're in close proximity to a receiver.
Is this because of the design of RFID chips, or is it possible to make one that doesn't?
What would stop them from putting a chip in you that wasn't dependent like that?
The chips I am aware of have no power source of their own - they're capacitively(*) coupled and obtain power generated in a field by the receiver.
What would stop "them" from putting in a chip that didn't depend on being powered by an external field? It'd have to have it's own power source, and you wouldn't want something like that embedded in you. :p
ETA: The passive chips used today aren't technically capacitively or inductively coupled, but still depend on the receiver as a power source.