(February 10, 2015 at 5:08 am)Rational AKD Wrote:(February 9, 2015 at 6:48 am)FreeTony Wrote: And you call this higher consciousness "God"? If so, essentially your 1 assumption is "because I exist, a God exists".and? what does it matter what the assumption is? materialism assumes there God. the point is the assumptions are fewer. it's more parsimonious to think consciousness is fundamental than to postulate an unverifiable material substance that's supposedly behind our perceptual states.
So it's fine to postulate an unverifiable God that is responsible for your consciousness, but not an unverifiable material substance?
You are making more than one assumption. You are assuming that a God exists, it is a being and has a consciousness like you do, but this consciousness is somehow different to yours in that it can control yours, and that this consciousness is the reason that you have a consciousness.
All you have experienced is your own consciousness - this has few of the properties of what you call a "grand consciousness"/God.