RE: Best description of Christianity
February 12, 2015 at 3:17 am
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2015 at 3:18 am by Whateverist.)
(February 12, 2015 at 3:02 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(February 12, 2015 at 2:36 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Yes. Because I'm not crazy and I know my eyes and even my brain can deceive me. That's why we have science, which is based on replicable experiments and evidence.
Really? You do realize that one species of animal has never been observed to evolve into a completely different species, nor has it ever been replicated, yet you believe it's possible.
Since you describe yourself as a god first, non-religious xtian I wonder how you can be so certain evolution, plate tectonics and big bangs can't be an accurate description of the past. Why do you saddle yourself with such an antiquated point of view?