(February 13, 2015 at 1:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Since the classifications we use are Latin I seriously doubt Noah used the same system. How the animals were classified is not clear, what IS clear is that only two animals from each classification were taken.
Is this seriously the extent of your argument? You don't know how the animals were classified, but you do know that evolution as we currently understand it doesn't represent how those classes were arrayed... despite not knowing anything at all about the situation?
Do you understand how profoundly dishonest that is? You refuse to properly define your own position, you say you don't even know what the details of your position really are, and yet you expect us to argue against this mystery conclusion you've come to? How? How can anyone properly argue against your position, when in reality it's just whatever you need it to be to continue disagreeing with a scientific subject you know next to nothing about?
You essentially don't have a position beyond "you're all wrong," because you either don't have, or refuse to provide, sufficient details to comprise a real stance on this issue.
And is the existence of Noah and the flood an "example" or is it something you truly believe in? Because if it's not the latter, then even your basis for disagreement doesn't exist.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!