(February 13, 2015 at 4:44 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Well, gosh, how about the fact that the entirety of your stance is completely unjustified, based on self serving definitions that don't match those of the scientific community, revolving around mechanisms that prevent genetic change from accumulating that you haven't even specified, and relying on the Noah's flood narrative, which is not only contradicted by all of the physical evidence, but has no evidentiary support of its own? How about all of that?Wow, an atheist disagrees with a theist, shocking...
Oh, and how about the fact that your position lacks any information content too?
(February 13, 2015 at 4:44 pm)Esquilax Wrote: It's cute that you think that. But everyone here's already aware of how deeply you're entrenched in the Dunning-Kruger effect, you don't need to keep reminding us.
If you're saying i don't have the evidence to back up that statement, I know you can't be that foolish....
