(August 17, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Captain Scarlet Wrote:(August 17, 2010 at 4:00 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Because he might want things to work that way. This simple sentence defeats your argument from incredulity.Not if he is all loving.
Have a nice day,
Rhizo
An argument from incredulity is where you cannot imagine the converse being true so you draw a false conclusion. You will note I have stated the it is more likely if atheism is true, not that it conclusively disproves theism. In addition you'll note I have stated the alternative conclusion that evolution could be false and thereby have imagined alternative if IMO less satisfactory conclusion. This argument for atheism from evolution is correctly stated. I'm afraid your statement was simplistic not simple.
and thank you I will , you too
Where did you define God as loving? Azagthoth is a God and it is completely unaware of what it does. An unaware god would allow anything to happen. Even if you were you to restate your claim using the Christian God it is very easy to see from Genesis that this world is a fallen world which leads to the idea that God might just want it to be this way because it teaches a lesson or something.
Rhizo