RE: Christian- 90% of us suck
February 20, 2015 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2015 at 11:56 am by robvalue.)
Are you aware that the first account (from which other gospels were copied) of the ressurection is widely considered to be a forgery?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16
Mark wasn't even an eye witness in the first place, his whole gospel is entirely hearsay. (As are the rest of the gospels.) And the ressurection quite possibly didn't even make it into that, but was added on later to "help" the story.
Just thought you'd be interested
I've mentioned it to christians before on here, but forgeries don't seem to bother them at all.
As for accuracy, the only way we know any of it is true is by confirming it ourselves. It's an error to assume any other part of the book is also true by association, especially when so much of it is clearly false.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16
Mark wasn't even an eye witness in the first place, his whole gospel is entirely hearsay. (As are the rest of the gospels.) And the ressurection quite possibly didn't even make it into that, but was added on later to "help" the story.
Just thought you'd be interested

I've mentioned it to christians before on here, but forgeries don't seem to bother them at all.
As for accuracy, the only way we know any of it is true is by confirming it ourselves. It's an error to assume any other part of the book is also true by association, especially when so much of it is clearly false.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum


