RE: 30/30 Rule
February 22, 2015 at 1:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2015 at 1:48 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(February 22, 2015 at 1:45 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:(February 21, 2015 at 4:26 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: I agree that the line as to what's acceptable is somewhat subjective, but I'll give you my perspective on it. Linking to an article without giving your own summary and argument for/against - OK. Linking to an article saying something along the lines of "Hey guys, what do you think of this?" - not OK. When the link/video is the bulk of the meaningful content, it's very clearly over the line.
Pardon me if I'm misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that dropping a link with no commentary at all means that the bulk of the content. This seems to be a mixed message.
I think he got his wires crossed, and meant:
(February 21, 2015 at 4:26 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Linking to an article and giving your own summary and argument for/against - OK.Bolds/edit mine.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
