Lawrence Krauss vs William Lane Craig

[Esquilax]

Is this the video where LK heads off WLC's entire argument in his opener, and then WLC doesn't even have the wherewithal to course correct*, he just continues doing EXACTLY what LK said he would do?

*Yes, I understand that WLC had no ability to go off script :p

Well, see, in the "magisterial" use of reason, making already debunked arguments in a debate is highly unreasonable. But using the "ministerial" type of reason that WLC says is the only valid one, where rationality is subordinate to just assuming the bible is true, the bible is so obviously true that debunked arguments aren't that at all, because bible!

And that, dear friends, is why WLC is a terrible philosopher.