(February 27, 2015 at 1:10 pm)Surgenator Wrote:To the OP.(February 27, 2015 at 3:35 am)bennyboy Wrote: Not sure how relevant.It is relevant because the 2nd postulate of relativity doesn't hold in the photon's reference frame. The photon's velocity is 0 in its frame when relativity requires it to always be c.
Nevertheless, lets ignore this issue for the progress of your argument. If I say the photon's reference frame is valid, and it experiences no time and no distance traveled, where does this lead?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 25, 2025, 5:37 pm
Thread Rating:
Photons and determinism, part 2
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)