(August 22, 2010 at 6:09 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I'm not saying that we should stop eating meat either. I'm just saying that it being "natural" doesn't make it right. That would be the naturalistic fallacy. I just wanted to point that out I'm not saying that you're saying that natural=right.
Ah I get ya.
I should note that I'm a little tipsy at the moment and I'm currently prone to error in spelling and gamma. So bare with me
![Tongue Tongue](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
A whole bottle of wine can do quite a bit.
Anyway, I do agree that natural doesn't nesseraly mean ok, it's just benifi...fici..benificua...(fuck it)...good for us.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.