(February 27, 2015 at 11:49 pm)Surgenator Wrote:The hitting the eye isn't the proof. It is the lack of the passage of time which means we must mold our understanding of the universe primarily around light.(February 27, 2015 at 8:11 pm)bennyboy Wrote: To the OP.
"The answer must be no. No time has passed for that photon in its long journey, so it was always going to arrive at my eye, and no matter what happens in its journey, this is written in stone."
Something heading toward you and hitting you does not prove it was determined. You have to show that all cases with the same starting conditions will produce the same effect. We know this is not the case because some of the photons hit other stuff alone the way.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 11, 2025, 6:06 am
Thread Rating:
Photons and determinism, part 2
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)