RE: Photons and determinism, part 2
March 2, 2015 at 1:26 am
(This post was last modified: March 2, 2015 at 1:27 am by Surgenator.)
(March 1, 2015 at 11:45 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(March 1, 2015 at 10:37 pm)Surgenator Wrote: You're forgetting all the particles that are in between the emitter and the receiver. There is nothing preventing the photon from interacting with any of the other particles other than probability.Sure there is, and the OP is about that: that a timeless entity is not subject to causality. Restating things as we already think of them in our own framework doesn't really say much-- however the philosophical implications of trying to reconcile null values, infinities, and finite values in a single system mean that mundane way of looking at things is flawed.
Anyway, I think we're starting to get the wheel-go-round effect. Should we officially dub this thread exhausted?
You're failing to realize that all the possible interactions are brought into simultaneity in the photon's reference frame. If a photon had a 50% chance of interacting with a another particle but didn't, the probability of interaction still exist independent of which frame you're in.
Edit:
I don't like giving people the last word when I believe they are flatly wrong.