Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 9:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist only discussion of morality.
#9
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality.
(August 25, 2010 at 8:05 pm)lrh9 Wrote: This is the extension of atheism and vegetarianism thread. Someone said that since some organisms feel pain it is wrong to kill and eat them.

It's as simple as that.

Then I definately agree with you.
Granted I do personally believe that forcing things to suffer pain is wrong (I still don't know how I feel about boiling live lobsters - despite my LOVE of lobster), but like hell if I'm not going to eat things that can feel pain. Some of my favorite things to eat can feel pain!

As one guy on futurama said, we'd probably eat people too if they didn't taste lousy. (Though in futurama they do drink soylent cola, so I suppose humans are better in soylent and/or cola form.)

Though I suppose the serious point of mine here is that neurons firing pain signals into the brain or not from the preparation to being eaten does in no way I can see have an intrinsic moral value to it that isn't also assoicated with eating living things in general.
I mean, why discriminate between a broccoli and a cow? They're both precious living things with just as much right to live as one another, why should I discriminate between one or another?
It's this line of thinking that some things, because they are alive and want to live, intrinsicly makes it more moral to make sure they live a full productive life, but another grand, long lived living thing - such as poison ivy or cabbage, are living things also. Why should we discriminate and prey on them in lieu of cows, pigs, and chicken?

If living things are precious and should not be killed, then all murder is wrong - be it mosquito, human, or the human enslavement tree. On that morality we should eat nothing except sunlight and 100% pure water that has been treated to carefully remove all single-celled organisms from being digested or we should eat nothing at all.

It's ridiculous.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925

Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 25, 2010 at 7:28 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 25, 2010 at 7:50 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by Edwardo Piet - August 25, 2010 at 7:51 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 25, 2010 at 7:54 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 25, 2010 at 8:05 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by TheDarkestOfAngels - August 25, 2010 at 8:16 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by parrotpirate - August 27, 2010 at 7:40 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by parrotpirate - August 27, 2010 at 9:24 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 25, 2010 at 8:20 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by theVOID - August 25, 2010 at 10:31 pm
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by DeistPaladin - August 27, 2010 at 9:58 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 26, 2010 at 6:23 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 27, 2010 at 7:43 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by Tiberius - August 27, 2010 at 7:53 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by leo-rcc - August 27, 2010 at 8:19 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by lrh9 - August 27, 2010 at 10:55 am
RE: Atheist only discussion of morality. - by padraic - August 27, 2010 at 9:10 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Beauty, Morality, God, and a Table FrustratedFool 23 3399 October 8, 2023 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  "Are all actions in life based on interest only"? WinterHold 38 4073 April 16, 2023 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 15527 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ
  Subjective Morality? mfigurski80 450 54835 January 13, 2019 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Do we only do things we want to do? DodosAreDead 9 1400 November 19, 2018 at 12:41 am
Last Post: tackattack
  Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion bennyboy 238 25209 October 8, 2018 at 3:20 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Law versus morality robvalue 16 1775 September 2, 2018 at 7:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread Whateverist 598 86059 June 12, 2018 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  Objective morality: how would it affect your judgement/actions? robvalue 42 9878 May 5, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  1st Call for Christian Only Debate: Our Role on AF Neo-Scholastic 132 20368 May 4, 2018 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)