(August 26, 2010 at 3:39 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: What I wonder is what your opinion is on the point that however fine-tuned and amazing the universe is, God would have to be even more fine-tuned if he created it without there being an explanation for him. He'd require an even bigger explanation.
What's your opinion on that?
When I heard Dawkins propose this argument, one question immediately popped in my head:
"What do you base that on?"
His assumption was that "Complexity of Designer > Complexity of Thing Designed" and this formula always holds. But is this true? Don't we design things bigger and more complex than us all the time? I suppose it depends on how you define "complexity".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
