New Testament arguments

[JuliaL]

---

Hey fellow human peoples, so I need a little help here. I'm trying to form a relatively air tight stance on the illogical inconsistencies of the new testament in the event that all hell breaks loose and I find myself arguing against a christian who somehow circumvents the ridiculousness of the old testament and is able to stand on the new testament by itself.
Now I know there is a plethora of factual contradictions in the first four books themselves which you'd think would be enough, but I need something more than a basic fact check to debate this. I need a philosophical/theological/moral point to make like you can do so easily with the old testament.

---

Does anyone know if Jesus ate babies, for instance, or liked The Last Airbender movie?

I think the baby eating Jesus works.
http://gnosis.org/library/inftoma.htm

After that again he went through the village, and a child ran and dashed against his shoulder. And Jesus was provoked and said unto him: Thou shalt not finish thy course (lit. go all thy way). And immediately he fell down and died.

Or at least the baby killing Jesus.

From there you can get into all sorts of fun with the reliability of the early NT writings, the suppression of alternate gospels, the politics of fourth century Rome (and Constantinople). It is a real gospel....no it's not a real gospel...but it was written on papyrus...we have no original autographs...
Its a bullshit fest and jobs program that has lasted 2000 years and provided sustenance for untold thousands of clerics. Have fun.