New Testament arguments

[Huggy Bear]

No I'm talking about how fans (real people) perceive a moral character in a show about the zombie apocalypse. There were / are two moral characters, one being a priest, and they are both hated by fans because their morality is seen as a weakness.

Fictional people in a fictional scenario do fictional things and are hated by fans of said fictional narrative for their fictional weaknesses? And? Am I missing something?

Aren't we discussing a hypothetical situation in the first place? I'm under no illusions that If an apocalypse were to occur, people wouldn't be killing each other in the streets, to assume otherwise is just naive, i suppose, if you were desperate enough you also wouldn't resort to cannibalism?

---

So what you're really saying is that since the results of said test (ie: death) cannot be shared, documented or proven, that it's not really a test at all since no one can verify the results. And since the results can't be verified, sin can't be proven as real.

You can verify it for yourself, unless you need someone else to do your critical thinking for you.....