(March 25, 2015 at 7:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(March 25, 2015 at 6:58 pm)Judi Lynn Wrote: So I guess in retrospect, according to huggy, apparently we (non-believers) shouldn't discuss Santa, greeblings, the Easter Bunny, and ANY work of fiction (because it's not real), just to name a few.I never bring up the discussion in the first place!
I guess I'm not allowed to discuss my thoughts on any of these things because they are all imaginary. But... Huggy is allowed to discuss things like the fictional work of the bible because to him it's factual.
There go those fucking double standards again. First with drippy, now with huggy. Please continue to let me know where I stand with regards to my FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS and what I can or cannot discuss.
Show me where I started any thread on any subject.
Besides many of the discussions I have aren't about religion, but are about things that can be proven, but guess what? When you atheists are provided with proof you still refuse to accept it, as proven in the whole secularism of Denmark discussion.
Did I SAY you start these discussions? Honestly, your dribble is getting quite annoying. You're circular bullshit should be earning you a one way ticket out of here. I'm not the only person sick and tired of your pointless shit-stirring word salad.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
