Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"

[Esquilax]

The point is, that whole scenario was made up in your mind. Rape was never discussed....So whatever you thought my position was is moot...because that conversation never happened.

Ah yes, we were actually discussing slavery. But the point remains, that my initial argument said nothing at all about you attempting to defend rape, and yet you're claiming that it did... which is dishonesty.

Fiat currency IS NOT inherently more valuable than monopoly money, and gold IS more valuable than fiat currency because it is a COMMODITY.
Got it?

I get that it's a diversion to get away from answering for what you say in this thread. Don't think I haven't noticed the large tracts of my post that somehow went missing when you responded to them.

Where exactly did I deny evolution?

No, I'm denying their version of evolution.

Right here. The "they" in that sentence refers to biologists, to Darwin himself, in fact, and "they" are absolutely the people who get to define what their own terms mean. You deny their version of evolution, you deny evolution period. You don't get to make up your own definition and then pretend it's exactly as legitimate as the one that's been tested and observed to happen. It's roughly akin to being a person who denies that germs exist, but insists that he doesn't deny germ theory because he's decided that the word "germs" actually means "monkeys," and he accepts that monkeys exist. It's ridiculous, but playing around with definitions rather than using them honestly is also like ninety percent of your debate strategy too.

Now, I also said some things about your ridiculous assertions regarding science, which you seem to think that just ignoring will make them go away. Perhaps you'd like to respond to those, since they were the latest and most relevant ridiculous things you've said today?