Others have answered your post that the Bible isn't so clear on the issue of salvation.
I can only add to reiterate my point that such wrangling over the issue of Christology between Muslims and various Christians sounds like babbling over hair-splitting nonsense to those of us who acknowledge we live in a natural universe. There's no evidence for Heaven or Hell, never mind how to get there. Consequently, your distinction with Islam is virtually meaningless to me.
Can you name for me one (1) edition of the Bible that translates Luke 2:2 with the word "before" instead of "during", "while" or "when"? Just curious.
I can only add to reiterate my point that such wrangling over the issue of Christology between Muslims and various Christians sounds like babbling over hair-splitting nonsense to those of us who acknowledge we live in a natural universe. There's no evidence for Heaven or Hell, never mind how to get there. Consequently, your distinction with Islam is virtually meaningless to me.
(September 4, 2010 at 12:49 pm)theophilus Wrote: Perhaps you can find the answer here:
http://www.gotquestions.org/Quirinius-census.html
Can you name for me one (1) edition of the Bible that translates Luke 2:2 with the word "before" instead of "during", "while" or "when"? Just curious.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
