(April 17, 2015 at 10:21 am)nicanica123 Wrote: Thanks for all the replies on the other thread I started. One poster recommended that maybe I start with just 1 point and go from there. The following is what rattles through my brain. Please remember that I'm not debating I'm sharing my thoughts...If god wants to believe he exist, she should prove to us that he exist. The minimum standard needed to prove to human beings that she exist is the "human" standard. She can go higher is there is a higher version.
The argument against god that there is no proof
My few thoughts on this are as follows, 1. Why would this almighty god be subjected to what a human demands as proof?
Quote:2. Does gods creation not make him apparent?You assumed we are created. Evidence supports evolution not creation.
Quote:3. If god popped up one day to make himself readily known as existing, would all people serve him any way?Serve her, probably not. Know that she exist, yes.
Quote:4. If gods purpose as I have been taught, is that one day the earth will be a paradise like state with no evil. Back to its original Eden conditions. Proving that Satan, Adam, and Eve were wrong to reject gods sovereignty and humans are not capable of ruling themselves... how would it serve his purpose if people worshipped him out of fear of him killing them rather than from their hearts?So what is the purpose of hell again? Killing them would be more merciful than torturing them for all eternity.
I know the last one will get a lot of flack
