He or she sounds like me: arrogant pompous ass. :-) What he/she may be getting at is that God isn't just a thing among other things. Sensible objects exist in time & space, are subject to various types of cause, have potentials, etc. In contrast to this, any god worthy of the name would be the cause of space, time and material, be in full actuality, serve as the foundation of cause.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 18, 2025, 10:22 am
Thread Rating:
God as a non-empirical being
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)