(April 22, 2015 at 6:11 am)Nope Wrote:(April 22, 2015 at 6:02 am)paulpablo Wrote: This is the appropriate dictionary definition of care in regards to this topic.
I would say that if something upsets you then it concerns you. According to the definition you do care about your significant others sexual history if you find it interesting.
The wording of this thread isn't my original question. I'm basically copying off the exact same thread which asked the same question without a poll for 2 reasons. It's better with a poll, and I don't understand how people can say they don't care about their partners sexual history. It seems to be like it would be an innate concern.
I chose other because even the definition you used could be just a casual interest or a more negative concern. I know I am getting nitpicky but I just want to make certain I answered the question correctly
Well this doesn't make sense to me. You said that if your previous partner had a history of tricking people into bed then it would concern you in a negative way. You said you find your partners sexual history also to be something you find interesting. You're concerned and interested about your partners sexual history yet you still didn't vote yes on this poll.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
