Do you care about your significant others sexual past with a poll.

[paulpablo]

I answered no and as a general rule it is my criteria.

I would mind only if something like STD's and similar issues were at risk, but that's an exception to the rule.

If the person in question cheated or tricked several people this would cause some adverse reactions but it's because of trust, confidence and loyalty - Not because I think having more sex makes you a less worthy human.

Again I'm confused as to why you would vote no.

As I already said in the original thread which got this conversation going only a small part of it was about the actual numbers of partners a person has.
And surely most people would agree that someone's sexual history or sexual past is more than just a numerical issue.  It can range from what a person liked, didn't like, which type of sex, what sexuality they classed themselves as, fetishes so and and so on and so on.

So the question never was to begin with "Do you think having more sex makes you a less worthy human." 

So if cheating and trickery were a part of your partners sexual history you would care about that yet you voted in this poll that you don't care about your partners sexual history.

I think the main point of confusion here is that some people are basically saying sexual history = the number of people you slept with.

But I see it as a much more vague term.  I see it as being the history of sexual things in someones past.  What they liked, diskiled, who they liked it with, how many, where they liked it, when they liked it.