(April 24, 2015 at 8:34 am)Mezmo! Wrote: The legal metaphor of natural laws is based on the idea of a law giver.huh?!
(April 24, 2015 at 8:34 am)Mezmo! Wrote: It is appropriate to ask why such laws consistently hold true. The typical atheist answer is that they just do. The more curious and critical response by believers is that there is a cause for each observable fact. This is known as the principle of sufficient reason.
Why shouldn't those laws hold true, absent of such a "cause"?
I'd guess that a cause would be required to keep changing the laws... that they seem immutable is a testimony to the absence of such a "cause".