(April 27, 2015 at 8:42 pm)IAOALGIV Wrote:(April 27, 2015 at 8:41 pm)Jericho Wrote: That's actually a good example, Polaris.Depends on what you consider evidence.
And I agree with what Esquilax said. How does it make sense that with no evidence whatsoever of God's existence, he would expect me to fully buy into a glorified book of fairy tales as reality? And if I didn't believe this book that has as much realistic information as the How to Train Your Dragon series, then I am going to be tormented in Hell for eternity?
Either way, I believe in none of that. But even if a god like that existed, I wouldn't want to follow him anyways.
I suppose that is true enough. However, I know that I am not the only one who believes there to be no evidence of a god's existence. So it isn't really as if I am the only one missing something. Evidence to me is anything that can undoubtedly prove the existence of a god. Is it too much to ask for irrefutable evidence? I know I am not the only Agnostic Atheist who would gladly reconsider my stance if a god was to actually show up and prove that he/she was real.