Dear atheists,

[Jericho]

I suppose that is true enough.  However, I know that I am not the only one who believes there to be no evidence of a god's existence.  So it isn't really as if I am the only one missing something.  Evidence to me is anything that can undoubtedly prove the existence of a god.  Is it too much to ask for irrefutable evidence?  I know I am not the only Agnostic Atheist who would gladly reconsider my stance if a god was to actually show up and prove that he/she was real.

And how would they provide evidence?

And there it is...the question that has been asked for years. It is logical to believe that there is no way to provide evidence of there being a god, seeing as how the majority of theists maintain that he/she/they is(are) supernatural beings that are beyond the physical world. So therefore, with no reasonable way to obtain evidence, it is only logical to not believe that god(s) exist. That is like me saying that I have an invisible friend named Charles who is omnipotent. I can't see Charles and neither can you, but I will argue to the death that he is there. Do you believe that Charles exists? What if I handed you a book that I say Charles wrote that claims that he is there. Would you believe in him then?

I could go on...