(April 28, 2015 at 10:31 am)pocaracas Wrote: And god is automagically exempt from its own rule by a technicality of language, huh?Jaime killed a man. Billy murdered a man. Does that mean Jaime isn't guilty of murder based on a technicality of language? Or does it mean what it says, that Jaime killed a man and Billy murdered a man because killing and murdering are two different acts?
A technicality, let's not forget, that doesn't carry too well into "future" translations... Sounds dubious for a rule handed out directly from a god that, if we are to believe those "in the know", should know the future.
(April 28, 2015 at 10:31 am)pocaracas Wrote: I guess he's the same god that made arabic be the one and only perfect language to convey its message a few centuries later, huh? The right language is always the on in use where it "speaks" to people, it seems...The God of the Bible is not the god of the Qur'an.
If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?