Do you care about your significant others sexual past with a poll.

[paulpablo]

But then if you care about your womans past sex life in the sense that you're not interested in prudes or virgins then wouldn't you say that means you are judging them based on that?

If you're already judged them to be unworthy of any of your personal interest based on either a lack of sexual contact with other people or no sexual contact with other people.

You just made your poll question meaningless by equivocating consideration and "care". That's what you are now arguing right, if anyone considers any aspect of a partner's sexual history they must "care"?

I agree with PT and I don't care. I just need some assurance that I'm not going to get an STD. The first five minutes of fornication will tell me everything else I need to know; dossiers are not required when auditioning is the means of evaluation.

No I'm using the word care in the usual way anyone would use the word.  Meaning will it cause significant interest to you and possibly change the way you act around them or if you want to be with them or not.

Parkers tan I think seems to be contradicting himself because he's basically saying that he doesn't judge people based on sexual history yet he's saying based on a virgin's sexual history or a prude's sexual history of having no partners or very few partners he judges them to be not interesting.

I  think other people have made this contradiction too, saying they don't care about a partners sexual history but they want to be with someone experienced.  Care doesn't have to be negative, it can be positive, like a boss interviewing someone for a job cares if the person being interviewed has sufficient experience in the job role.