AGW is most likely true.
Even if it is not, I prefer that we take a Pascal's Wager approach to the problem: it's better to over-estimate the danger and play it safe, than it is to underestimate it and play it fast-and-loose.
Even if it is not, I prefer that we take a Pascal's Wager approach to the problem: it's better to over-estimate the danger and play it safe, than it is to underestimate it and play it fast-and-loose.