RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
September 17, 2010 at 8:16 pm
(This post was last modified: September 17, 2010 at 8:18 pm by HeyItsZeus.)
According to my morals, yes. But Nazis will think otherwise obviously.
![[Image: mud%20filled%20brain%20nazi.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=hs.riverdale.k12.or.us%2F~hfinnert%2Fexhib_04%2FLeighm%2Fmud%2520filled%2520brain%2520nazi.gif)
I happen to know a bunch of old guys from Sicily who would say otherwise. They say it was forced on them. (My wonderful great grandparents)
![[Image: mud%20filled%20brain%20nazi.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=hs.riverdale.k12.or.us%2F~hfinnert%2Fexhib_04%2FLeighm%2Fmud%2520filled%2520brain%2520nazi.gif)
(September 17, 2010 at 7:25 pm)solja247 Wrote: This is one of the largest problems with Atheism. Atheists can be 'good' people. But everything is permissible...
Quote:But he was bad for human beings in general, caused a great deal of suffering (an understatement to be sure). That's good enough reason to be opposed to tyrants like Hitler-- there's no need to stray into metaphysics.
How was he bad for the human race? A lot of Europeans didnt like the Jews, if anything he was doing Europe a favour.
I happen to know a bunch of old guys from Sicily who would say otherwise. They say it was forced on them. (My wonderful great grandparents)

Quote:"An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity. "
Martin Luther King, Jr.