(April 26, 2015 at 6:12 pm)pauloroberts Wrote: No the advice has been stupid. Now that I know what she was all along, I'm not happy about it. Her ability to bond has been compromised severely, and she has devalued herself.
(April 27, 2015 at 3:45 pm)pauloroberts Wrote: Sucking off 2 men in an alleyway is not what I would call being in touch with her sexuality. Do you think that's classy? Same goes for all the other depraved things she's done.
(April 28, 2015 at 3:42 am)pauloroberts Wrote: It's different for men. Women are more emotional and they get attached very quickly. But when she has sex with lots of different people, she becomes far less able to bond with a man. This is a well known fact and it's hilarious that you're arguing about it. You know it and I know it. By the way can I say that doing disgusting things in some dirty alleyway with 2 men is hardly "exploring her sexuality". that's just nasty. When are you people going to quit trying to paint a picture of such cheap acts being on a par with exploring one's sexuality? You people make me laugh. Let's call it what it is. Cheap and nasty. It's like eating mcdonalds out of a trash can and calling that "exploring my palette" or "exploring cuisine". What a hoot.(bold mine)
(May 21, 2015 at 2:45 pm)Godslayer Wrote: Dude or ma'am, you're an idiot. The OP was not slut-shaming his partner like the original feminist idiot straw manned him to be saying. The only one trying to fit a narrative is you people who for some reason think it's slut-shaming to voice your opinion that you're not okay with a partner with a long sexual history.
The girl he's talking about will never know this shit ever existed, he's the one trying to get advice from people here and a bunch of idiots shit on him. I don't necessarily agree with what he's saying but jesus fucking christ if anyone is shaming anyone it's the feminist lynch mob and SJW's here.
So you wanna walk any of that back, asswipe? He was definitely slut shaming her. What's more, there's a term for not giving a shit about doing something that, if your loved one knew, they would be victimized. Sociopath. If my girlfriend posted my dick pics on the internet to complete strangers without my knowledge, I'm still being victimized. This is not to that degree, but the analogy stands up.
He could have said "Hey guys, my girlfriend told me she has a lot more sexual partners than I'm comfortable with, what should I do?" Instead, he gave an itemized list and then proceeded to tell us how depraved she is and how it's common knowledge that if you've had a lot of sexual partners and you're a female, you simply cannot pair bond. One doesn't look for advice from complete strangers on the internet. One looks for validation. And he barked up the wrong tree.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
