Quote:That is not exactly true, if something doesn't make sense then it can't be true. As an a logical sense... so it would be a good argument.
It is perfectly true. Most of why concepts like relativity make sense to us now is because we have an understanding of them, when GR first emerged it didn't really make sense to anyone, regardless of the fact that it's a true description of large scale reality.
Quantum Mechanics still doesn't make sense to anyone, but the predictions it makes continually verify it's truth.
The concept of perpetual motion and cold fusion make sense just as much as God does, but none of these things are true.
So something can be true without making sense and can be false while it does make sense.
Therefore an argument from an ability to 'make sense' of the proposition simply cannot be used to conclude upon the truth of any proposition.
Quote:Well it is more likely according Occam's Razor it is.
Bullshit, Because you need to give each god properties, proposing several gods require more assumptions than one god.
Quote: This is actually a reason I believe in hellenion.
And as was expected, your reasoning is flawed.
Quote: Because I believe in the law of cause and effect I think the Big Bang is a insuffient theory to the Universe, even though I think it is possible.
And we have another fundamental misunderstanding:
The Big Bang model DOES NOT explain the origin of the universe, or the creation of something from nothing - It describes the emergence of space-time from the "singularity"
Quote: While the contidiction in Monotheism are a plenty.
And why is your polytheism more probable? You still haven't made a single argument, you've simply asserted this as being true.
Quote:One the Flying Spaghetti Monster, is not a very old religion.
This is a fallacy, the argument from antiquity: The age of a belief has no bearing on whether or no the belief is true. For this to be accepted as an argument against the FSM, and to use this standard consistently, you would also have to use this as an argument for Geocentrism, it has been believed for much much longer than Heliocentrism and if antiquity is relevant then this would have to be considered evidence for Geocentrisim.
However, since we know Geocentrism to be false, that from every frame of reference outside this planet the earth rotates the Sun, it must be said that antiquity is not necessarily true, therefore to use it as an argument for the existence of one god concept over another, or to disregard a more recent concepts, is entirely unjustified.
Quote: Another problem is that Hellenion has a logical starting the Spaghetti Monster is monotheisic religion. I(as I said) don't think monotheism is logical answer to the universe.
You have asserted that to be true, but you haven't provided a single good reason for your position.
.