RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
September 21, 2010 at 11:17 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2010 at 11:20 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote:@Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of
God
Oh, I must have misread. My understanding was he was questioning the existence of morality without science, which is a strong indicator of profound ignorance and/or stupidity.
viz
Quote:He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy
Richard Dawkins may suffer fools, I don't. The OP's friend is still an ignoramus.