by makes sense I mean it is possible and not improble. Now before you go and challanage that. It is not a improble answer that universe started in Chaos and gave birth to the Creators of Man. Based on another religions storys it is pretty probable.ex: The six day theory. The Big Bang theory(we will confront that later). Even the Sun and the Moon having kids to create the universe. This probabilty is based on possiblity of existance and logical sense, as I meant to say(this about the Quantum Mechanics arguement) things that are commonsense. You mean to tell me that it is possible that Ocean is enity and that its demigods(water towers) move around at night and a whole bunch exploded with the ocean in it and that is why Iron is 4th most common element on earth, is logical explanation for the universe, according to Peter Shinner(Godless) it is. As we know that is crazy explanation for universe and is definitly not possible, why? Not because of Science. We can't prove that wrong, but we can use common sense. BTW Perputal motion maybe possible according to some scientists. Because(they give a example in the laws of thermodynamics[the one that says that particles can pop in and out existance inside a atom]) that not all the laws are perfect.
"Bullshit, Because you need to give each god properties, proposing several gods require more assumptions than one god. "
Your reasoning is flawed. Polythiesm in general is not due to assumptions about each gods personlity, we don't assume to know very many things about the Gods nor do we pretend too(Monothiesm). We simply claim that are Gods are the creators of the the World as we know it and that they have jobs, but this no more cocky than any other religion or asserting that there is no higher creator. Polythiesm makes more sense than Monotheism because of the innocence problems. The Gods never claimed that theyed help us, so why should we say that it is the Gods working in mysterious ways(monothiesm). In fact there are many examples that the Gods like to get in the way(see pandoras box), but take favour amoung some mortals more than others. The lack of a devil also helps Polythiesm. Polythiesm doesn't claim that there is supreme being that is so strong, yet he lets there be sin, and let it run rampent. Also the Gods could have differing intrests and that would cause the world to get alitte iffy. Also the existance of God that is all loving and all forgiving and lets his people rot in hell(Monothiesm) is contary to reality.
The big bang, is according to theory, the event that lead to the formation of universe. Now there are many more problems then the cause and effect law, also the problem that information can't travel faster then the speed of light.Also known as the Horizon problem. Not to mention the Dark matter and energy problem and the flatness problem. And don't tell me about the Inflation theory, it has too many contridictions. BTW Space and time are 2 differnant varibles.
That is little bit childish. FSM is a 5 year old religion. Geocentrism is not true, we know that but think about this ok so there are only 2 problems with comparing Geocentrism with religion. One that if something is made up and completly no reason behind it, when is more likely to be made closer to the beginning of man, or toward the middle? Also another thing religion is not a scientific theory. So at comparing those things:
"Bullshit, Because you need to give each god properties, proposing several gods require more assumptions than one god. "
Your reasoning is flawed. Polythiesm in general is not due to assumptions about each gods personlity, we don't assume to know very many things about the Gods nor do we pretend too(Monothiesm). We simply claim that are Gods are the creators of the the World as we know it and that they have jobs, but this no more cocky than any other religion or asserting that there is no higher creator. Polythiesm makes more sense than Monotheism because of the innocence problems. The Gods never claimed that theyed help us, so why should we say that it is the Gods working in mysterious ways(monothiesm). In fact there are many examples that the Gods like to get in the way(see pandoras box), but take favour amoung some mortals more than others. The lack of a devil also helps Polythiesm. Polythiesm doesn't claim that there is supreme being that is so strong, yet he lets there be sin, and let it run rampent. Also the Gods could have differing intrests and that would cause the world to get alitte iffy. Also the existance of God that is all loving and all forgiving and lets his people rot in hell(Monothiesm) is contary to reality.
The big bang, is according to theory, the event that lead to the formation of universe. Now there are many more problems then the cause and effect law, also the problem that information can't travel faster then the speed of light.Also known as the Horizon problem. Not to mention the Dark matter and energy problem and the flatness problem. And don't tell me about the Inflation theory, it has too many contridictions. BTW Space and time are 2 differnant varibles.
That is little bit childish. FSM is a 5 year old religion. Geocentrism is not true, we know that but think about this ok so there are only 2 problems with comparing Geocentrism with religion. One that if something is made up and completly no reason behind it, when is more likely to be made closer to the beginning of man, or toward the middle? Also another thing religion is not a scientific theory. So at comparing those things:
