The Historical Reliability of the New Testament

[robvalue]

Yes, I admitted I could be wrong about absolutely everything. It doesn't however mean I update my beliefs every time someone tells me to. They have to provide a good reason. Pointing at the same book, or a particular part of that book, which I've been well aware of my whole life does not constitute a good reason. I've given you every opportunity to convince me, giving you every concession I could reasonably make and I'm afraid you have come up short.

I don't have preconceptions, I simply have the same scepticism as I'd apply to any supernatural God account, as would you if it wasn't your own holy book. I have no agenda or vested interest in continuing to believe it's not true, because I don't care if it's true. That lends me quite a lot of objectivity.