RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 5, 2015 at 7:58 pm
Well said, Brian. Almost by statistics there had to be at least one fucker name Y'shua bar Yusef because both were common names.
It doesn't matter. It is not the man that xtians follow but the magic tricks. As H. L. Mencken noted:
There is no possibility whatsoever of reconciling science and theology, at least in Christendom. Either Jesus rose from the dead or he didn’t. If he did, then Christianity becomes plausible; if he did not, then it is sheer nonsense.
It doesn't matter. It is not the man that xtians follow but the magic tricks. As H. L. Mencken noted:
There is no possibility whatsoever of reconciling science and theology, at least in Christendom. Either Jesus rose from the dead or he didn’t. If he did, then Christianity becomes plausible; if he did not, then it is sheer nonsense.