RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 6, 2015 at 3:58 am
They go on about a historical Jesus like it actually proves something. I personally don't believe in the historical Jesus, but I'm willing to concede one for the sake of argument, just like I'd be willing to concede a historical Harry Potter, because it proves nothing. It doesn't mean there were any miracles, it doesn't mean Jesus was the son of god and it doesn't lend any credibility to the "truth" of Christianity. All we've established is that someone lived, and the tall stories were based on him. So what?