The case for atheism seems to be very well established, if you call it a case. The idea that you need an argument seems unnecessary. They way I, a layman, understand it is thus: my belief or faith in a god or any god or gods requires proof that is reproducible out side of subjective testimony. Absence of this proof leads me to have an absence of belief or faith in a god, or gods.
Pretty cut and dry. But I'm a layman in both reasoned argument and religious studies. Nevertheless until I see an experiment that shows divine intervention clearly I'll continue as I am.
Pretty cut and dry. But I'm a layman in both reasoned argument and religious studies. Nevertheless until I see an experiment that shows divine intervention clearly I'll continue as I am.
"I'm thick." - Me
