RE: Ask an Anti-Feminist!
June 7, 2015 at 7:47 am
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2015 at 7:48 am by Dystopia.)
Quote:Men do 92% more dangerous jobs and put their lives on the line - why can't women do more dangerous jobs? That's crazy talk!Not only can they - I'm in favour of them doing so and feminists have been arguing for it - In fact, in Everydayfeminism there was an article advocating more women on construction working.
For the part that matters - There's certain jobs we see as masculine or feminine in society, and depending on the number of people in them and the demographics, women and men are automatically more likely to opt or deny those jobs - Women are socialized from birth to not try to compete with men and that's noticeable in gender segregation toys, school segregation ("Don't play football with boys, play dolls with your friends", etc.), etc.
Quote:Being male-dominated isn't necessarily a problem - that just evidences that men are more likely to opt for that job. Women, if they really want to, can opt for those jobs if they want --- but once you look at University stats, we find that women like to choose different subjects, despite having the opportunity to choose traditional subjects -- that's what happens when you give equal opportunity.But why? Why are men more likely to choose that job? If you have 50% of the population making drastically different choices, why is that happening? Are female brains wired to automatically follow liberal arts, social sciences or education? Are men's brains wired to be engineers, politicians or CEO's? If, so, what evidence do you have? If not, then how can you say these choices are justified? Why do you think there's certain jobs associated with femininity, usually to do with secondary roles, education and helping people (social services, primary school teachers, nursing, etc.)? Why can I, with absolute certainty, assume that, regardless of which country you come from, there will be more men dominating society and following better paid jobs (no exceptions)?
I don't think ''lack of role models'' is the serious problem, if women want it, then go get it - they have the means to do so.
That's basically a modified version of the argument "if the poor want to be rich, they can just work hard and get out of povery". It's not that simple. Women are socially less likely to go to something when it's male dominated, and that's an observable phenomenon. Having role models is great and helps boosting the credibility of jobs. If I grow up without seeing people of my gender in certain jobs and no one reassures me I can be one of those I'll probably be less likely to think it's a good option for the future
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you