RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 3:52 pm
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2015 at 3:54 pm by TheMessiah.)
(June 7, 2015 at 3:37 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(June 7, 2015 at 3:13 pm)TheMessiah Wrote: I suppose, just like calling someone a misogynist over and over again would have a different result.
You seem to be confused about the quote function. My post in which I stated that you are a misogynist was quoted over and over again. That was not me writing it over and over, that was people using the quote function. You might want to read up on how message boards like this one function.
You also are confused about the purpose of the post. It was a response to someone else, not to you. I did not expect to convince you of anything with it.
You might also want to work on your skills with links, as yours does not take one to any particular post of mine, but to page 14 of a thread.
You really are exposing yourself to ridicule with the things you state. Of course I do not expect you to stop doing that.
Your post is one page - which is good enough; the rhetoric of ''trying many times expecting a different result'' well-fits the misogynist accusation.
(June 7, 2015 at 3:43 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:You do care what people think.
Your comments towards me proved it.
Hey, Mess....let's get something straight. You are here at an Atheist Forum sprinkling jesus dust on the carpet. I did not track you down and tell you that you were wrong at a xtian sight. You wandered into the cross-hairs. I know you think you are fucking brilliant and all the "authorities" you choose to cite are unimpeachable but you are wrong. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR YOUR GODBOY. All you have are the silly ( at best ) rantings of delusional assholes who also believed in stuff that never happened.
When you can deal with that fact, let me know. BTW, ask the muslims what I think of their bullshit.
Thanks for not addressing my specific concerns.
Not only did you ignore a significant part of my post, but your post, and arguably, your rhetoric is showing me that you see Atheism as an ideology; which I repeat, is something that it is not and never can be. Hence, my point stands - you are viewing it an a tribalistic lense.