RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 9, 2015 at 2:26 am
(June 9, 2015 at 2:23 am)robvalue Wrote: I've aware of all the evidence, I believe. There isn't much, and it isn't good. The extrapolations aren't convincing. A historian still needs to explain why they come to any particular conclusion, and if I think the reasoning is flawed then I reject it. Sure, that's just my opinion. All we can have is opinions, it's not like science where we can actually test any of them.
You're right that it's not as verifiable as Science, however the historical opinion is far more informed. Either way, I'm fine with you not agreeing with what a historian thinks.
http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/faq/religion