RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 9, 2015 at 2:45 am
Historical Jesus vs. climate change... I'll take "false equivocation" for $200, Alex.
If the climate change hypothesis had as much compelling evidence as the HJ does, despite many years of searching, then yes I think it wouldn't be unreasonable to speculate about motivations (conspiracy is a bit presumptuous, and mischaracterises your opponents which you agreed not to do). Factor in the known and admitted forgeries and we're entitled to ask why the need to invent evidence if there is such overwhelming consensus?
If the climate change hypothesis had as much compelling evidence as the HJ does, despite many years of searching, then yes I think it wouldn't be unreasonable to speculate about motivations (conspiracy is a bit presumptuous, and mischaracterises your opponents which you agreed not to do). Factor in the known and admitted forgeries and we're entitled to ask why the need to invent evidence if there is such overwhelming consensus?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
