This is a delicate topic. What method are we using to define the very meaning of "good", and "bad"? It is my personal opinion that those definitions were created by a general consensus among people. We can't use religion, because religion is only a way of living, not anything else. When humans feel emotions, there is generally a label for the source of the emotions. I feel "happy" is a "good" thing, and I feel "sad" is a bad thing, (as is the general consensus among people). Humans have, over the course of so many years, set up "good" and "bad" to be what they are in the eyes of us today. This "good" and "bad" only exists because the government creates laws, and culture shapes personality types. So, there is not really a yes or no answer to your question, because "good" and "bad" are only social boundaries, and only exist in our eyes because we were taught them. there is no actual "good" or "bad". Human life is only as valuable as you make it/ perceive it to be. Hitler had the power required to kill the Jewish people, and he did it. So, in theory, Hitler's life was more valuable than the Jew's because he had the power to end their lives, and they did not have the power to end his. However, "importance" is a whole different topic that I won't go into detail here about.
To sum it up, the "right" answer to your question is the opinion held by the one with the power to strip you of yours.
To sum it up, the "right" answer to your question is the opinion held by the one with the power to strip you of yours.
