Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Pyrrho]

Yes.  But recognizing a pattern does nothing to prevent it from occurring again.  I expect another thread on the subject of whether there was a historical Jesus or not within a few months of this one being abandoned.  And I expect the arguments to be pretty much the same. It is not as if it is likely that anyone is going to dig up a new document in the next couple of months.

This is ironic coming from a user who accused me of being a misogynist several times without a shred of proof, proving yourself not to be very ''skeptical'' as you claim, solely based on the fact that I did not like Feminism. I smell a hypocrite...

You must be a glutton for punishment, if you will pardon the homely old saying:

I suppose, just like calling someone a misogynist over and over again would have a different result.

You seem to be confused about the quote function.  My post in which I stated that you are a misogynist was quoted over and over again.  That was not me writing it over and over, that was people using the quote function.  You might want to read up on how message boards like this one function.

You also are confused about the purpose of the post.  It was a response to someone else, not to you.  I did not expect to convince you of anything with it.

You might also want to work on your skills with links, as yours does not take one to any particular post of mine, but to page 14 of a thread.

You really are exposing yourself to ridicule with the things you state.  Of course I do not expect you to stop doing that.

Are you incapable of learning anything?  Did you not look at the links before, and see that my post was quoted over and over, and I did not post it over and over?  Are you really that clueless?