Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

From same sex marriage to baby killing; yeah, makes perfect sense.

Considering that the point of it was to simply say that the state does permit actions which are not exactly dignity bestowing since the state acts according to its interest.

Furthermore, the respondents made an excellent relations between cases which I think would really win over Roberts.

Respondents said:

Roe V Wade (state cannot interfere in personal medical choice) is to Maher V Roe (person may not compel state to pay for personal medical choice. As Lawrence V Texas (state cannot interfere in personal intimacy choice) is to the current case Obergefell V Hodges (person may not compel state to pay for personal intimacy choice).

A brilliant move