RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
June 13, 2015 at 12:07 pm
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 12:10 pm by Ace.)
I have a question for those who are for same sex. From what I understand your opposite do not wish to grant you such right because of the possibility/assumption that marriage will not only included hetero and same sex but other sexual relationships, i.e. polygamy, incest, pedophilia, bestiality and so on. To say that is ridicules, what legal prof or protection do you have that will prevent the situation from not occuring?
Please keep in mind that court cases are already pending on the issue of polygamy and incest in several states, mind you, that are using the same sex marriage argument to undo prohibited laws. In addition, there is also a push to end statutory rape laws as well as give animals human rights. Even in reading parts of this blog, some of the participants have even stated that they would not mind polygamist or incest relationships to be accepted and any laws disband.
Can it not be said that the push to change and open marriage or elevates alternative relationships to traditional marriage/ acceptable relationships is actually occurring? Thus, calling the anti-same sex marriage, stupid, unrealistic, bigoted and so on, is possibly unjust if what they are saying is actually occurring?
In addition, to say that there are already a law in place to prevent any of the possible unwanted relationships is not a genuine answer, because there were laws against homosexuality also.
Please keep in mind that court cases are already pending on the issue of polygamy and incest in several states, mind you, that are using the same sex marriage argument to undo prohibited laws. In addition, there is also a push to end statutory rape laws as well as give animals human rights. Even in reading parts of this blog, some of the participants have even stated that they would not mind polygamist or incest relationships to be accepted and any laws disband.
Can it not be said that the push to change and open marriage or elevates alternative relationships to traditional marriage/ acceptable relationships is actually occurring? Thus, calling the anti-same sex marriage, stupid, unrealistic, bigoted and so on, is possibly unjust if what they are saying is actually occurring?
In addition, to say that there are already a law in place to prevent any of the possible unwanted relationships is not a genuine answer, because there were laws against homosexuality also.
