RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
September 30, 2010 at 2:31 am
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2010 at 2:31 am by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(September 29, 2010 at 11:34 pm)tackattack Wrote: I believe his atheist "we" was determinant of the atheists represented at this forum (but perhaps inclusively elsewhere) that have reached a mutual understanding that atheism is only about a disbelief in god.
Thank you Tacky that was exactly what I meant. I thought I was clear enough. Obviously not. By "not a right you enjoy here" I meant "not a right ANYONE enjoys here."
@Chuck
The point I was trying to make is that there is no such thing as an atheist spokesman,nor is there an atheist cause. One does not presume to speak for others unless elected as spokesperson.
The definition of 'atheist' I used was from the Concise Oxford Dictionary and is also the meaning used by consensus on this and many other atheist forums.
As far as I'm aware,there is no evidence to indicate what 'most' atheists think about anything..
